User account menu

  • Log in
A Green Syndicalist's Soapbox
That Green Union Guy
A Green Syndicalist's Soapbox

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Texts
  • Archives
  • Bibliography
  • Feeds
  • Links
  • Contact

No Kings and far too Many Strawmen

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Books, Texts, and Compendiums
  • Resisting Trump, MAGA, Fascism, and Dictatorship: A Resource Guide for Strategic Nonviolence
  • No Kings and far too Many Strawmen
By thatgreenunionguy | 11:23 PM UTC, Wed April 22, 2026

Introduction:

The third “No Kings”[1] protest is now behind us. Even before it occurred, and certainly after it, sectarian critics on the left have continued to denounce it. Here are some of the more frequently heard examples (in no particular order):

  • The protests are controlled opposition;
  • The protests “sheepdog” or funnel the attendees (back) into the Democratic Party establishment;
  • The protests are purely performative;
  • The protests have no clear objectives or demands;
  • The protesters are predominantly “middle class” (i.e. bourgeois) “liberals”;
  • The protesters will just return to “having brunch” once the protests are over;
  • Nonviolence just a form of white privilege;
  • The Protests just funnel demonstrators back into electoralism;
  • Protests aren’t enough; more organized, militant action is needed;
  • The protests are a start, but they’ll amount to nothing without real organizing.

In truth, such arguments are nothing new. I’ve been a militant, radical organizer for well over 32 years, and I speak from experience: such claims from sectarian leftist critics of them are as stale and hackneyed as the critics accuse the mass protests of being.

Why does this keep happening? While the sectarian critics will stubbornly and obstinately claim that the reason is because their criticisms are correct and “nobody listens to them”, or “the liberals keep co-opting them”, I’m convinced the critics are dead wrong, and are stuck in a codependent feedback loop which actually makes it harder for them to realize the goals they allegedly seek.

  1. The Overly Liberal Use of the Word “Liberal”
  2. “Controlled” Opposition or Stolen Thunder?
  3. From Where are the Protesters Being “Funneled” or “Sheepdogged”?
  4. The Sectarian Critics (as well as many Supporters) of Mass Protests Don’t Understand or Appreciate their Purpose and Function
  5. Chasing the Unicorn of the Ideal Revolutionary Agent
  6. Thy Doth Protest the Protests too Much
  7. …Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing

Download this text as a PDF file.

Footnotes:

[1] It could be argued that this is actually the fourth “No Kings” protest, because prior to the first one, held in June 2025, there was a smaller, yet significantly larger mass demonstration organized by many of the same organizations and coalitions called “Hands Off!” in April 2025. The reason for the original branding was opposition to Elon Musk and DOGE’s rapid takeover of the institutions of the administrative state, a takeover which threatened the privacy and wellbeing of millions of Americans. Due to the toxic unpopularity of MUSK and DOGE—due, in no short measure, to these mass protests and #TeslaTakedown—Trump washed his hands of them. The organizers of “Hands Off” rapidly rebranded to “No Kings” to shift the focus onto Trump’s autocratic fantasies, so in a very real way, all four compose a single movement arc.

  • The Overly Liberal Use of the Word “Liberal”.
  • “Controlled” Opposition or Stolen Thunder?
  • From Where are the Protesters Being “Funneled” or “Sheepdogged”?
  • The Sectarian Critics (as well as many Supporters) of Mass Protests Don’t Understand or Appreciate their Purpose and Function
  • Chasing the Unicorn of the Ideal Revolutionary Agent
  • Thy Doth Protest the Protests too Much
  • …Full of Sound and Fury, Signifying Nothing

Book traversal links for Books, Texts, and Compendiums

  • ‹ Essential Works on Strategy
  • Up
  • The Overly Liberal Use of the Word “Liberal”. ›

Fair Use Notice

Fair Use Notice: The material on this site is provided for educational and informational purposes. It may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. It is being made available in an effort to advance the understanding of scientific, environmental, economic, social justice and human rights issues etc.

It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have an interest in using the included information for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. The information on this site does not constitute legal or technical advice.

This site is created and maintained by a dues paying member of the IWW, however it is not an official IWW site, nor should any content included here imply an endorsement of it by the Industrial Workers of the World. Furthermore, the IWW globe in the header logo is not an official seal, and does not imply IWW endorsement of this site or any of its contents. To visit the IWW, please go to iww.org.

Footer menu

  • Home
  • Contact
Powered by Drupal

Creative Commons